Lawyer Advertising

Lawyers should not be restricted in their ability to provide truthful information to potential clients. Responsive Law opposes lawyer advertising rules that prevent consumers from having access to information they need to make an informed decision when hiring a lawyer.

Comments on ARDC Study of Client Matching Services, Submitted to the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (September 13, 2018)

​Comments on Proposed Amendments to Model Rules of Professional Conduct 7.1 to 7.5—Lawyer Advertising and Solicitation, Submitted to the American Bar Association Standing Committee on Ethics and Professionalism (March 1, 2018)
​
Comments on Participation in Online Platform for Finding and Employing a Lawyer, Submitted to the North Carolina State Bar Ethics Committee (October 12, 2017)

Comments on Lawyer Participation in Attorney Client Matching Services, Submitted to the New Jersey Supreme Court (July 17, 2017)

Comments on Lawyer Participation in Attorney Client Matching Services, Submitted to the Virginia State Bar Standing Committee on Ethics (May 5, 2017)​

Comments on Proposed Amendments to Model Rules of Professional Conduct on Lawyer Advertising and Solicitation, Submitted to the American Bar Association Standing Committee on Ethics and Professionalism  (March 1, 2017)

Comments on Proposed Amendments to Florida Bar 4-7.22 - Lawyer Referral Service, Submitted to the Florida Supreme Court (September 15, 2016)

Comments on Petition to Adopt Changes to Rules of Professional Conduct on Lawyer Advertising Submitted to the Supreme Court of Tennessee (March 11, 2013)
​